![]()
|
|
|
Seven
Deadly Sins THE MOST FUN in the Magazine Doctors line of work is being asked to take an idea and turn it into a successful magazine. That involves every discipline a publisher must master. Running a close second on the happy-adrenaline scale is developing a new media kit for a forward-thinking, aggressive publisher. It doesnt matter what type of magazine is involved or the industry it serves, since no two media kits will ever be alike, even when there are six or seven successful publications scrapping for the same readers and ad dollars. Over the years, the Magazine Doctor has arrived at strong viewpoints about media kits that work and those that dont. These opinions have been validated in two important ways(1) client appreciation when the media kits provably changed the way an industry viewed the publication (always with a resulting up-surge in ad revenues); and (2) peer approval in the form of five Maggie Awards, certifying these kits as the best of the year against all comers. Every few years when new kits flood ad agencies in the fall, the MagDoc also calls in 100 to 300 from leading magazines. He is always surprised at the number of hugely successful publications that have mediocre kits. Theyre a great reminder of the deadly sins producers of media kits commit. Sin Number 1: "Why do these people think I would even care?" So before the first word or the design sketch is put to paper, ask yourself (and the sales director and key salespeople): "What do we want this new media kit to do for us? What simple message about us must it convey (and sell)?" You wouldnt send a new salesperson out without clear instructions on what he or she is to accomplish. Youd say, "Prove our readers buy more of their products." Or, in the case of a business publication, "Convince them that only our deeply involved readers control the budgets that buy their products." Media kits can perform incredibly difficult sales tasks if theyre designed with an unmistakable purpose. Here are some examples of kits that exceeded publishers
wildest expectationsbecause their function was immediately
clear to the ad client:
The best media kits are developed and written from your advertisers point of view. It should appear to be all about them and their daily marketing concerns. If and when you and your publication come into the picture, it is because you represent an ideal solution to their marketing problems. The best kits will begin by addressing the advertisers market at length. These kits explore the problems of marketing within that industry and discussions of marketing needs, competitive climate and solutions for reaching buyers. An excellent kit may contain two or three major market studiesat least one of which should be new. These reports may mention the publications serving the field only in passing. Failure to give valid and extensive information about the market is where most media kits fail both the advertiser and the publication. Skimpy marketing coverage is a sure sign the publisher doesnt care enough, or refuses to invest enough, to put together genuinely excellent marketing package. A magazine publisher who fails to become an authority on his market is not doing his full job. The market is the world a magazines advertisers live and compete in. The magazine merely serves this market as an ideal means of bringing target purchasers face-to-face with sellers. Original research on the market can offer a mighty competitive advantage to a publication. But the data should not be raw; instead, it should be carefully interpreted to apply to the needs of the advertisers. Then, once youve proved your authority in the marketplace, its finally time to tell advertisers why your magazine is their best means of reaching a target segment of buyers. You prove that with the magazines reach and frequency, market coverage, loyal readership, big numbers, buying power, and other factors selling the publications readership. This is the cart. Your understanding and mastery of the market, and generosity in sharing the data, is the horse. A word on the writing that goes into a media kit: Encourage cribbing. Your designated writer (only one, preferably) should fashion everything in words and phrases that the media buyer can lift intact. You want to make it extremely easy for him/her to recommend heavy advertising in your market segment and to justify including your publication in the years ad budget. Sin Number 3: "Oh, wow," moans your client. Lets put this simply. A media kit should be cohesive. Every item should beand look like an integral part of a single package. There should be logic in the writing style, a single voice, and a clear presentation of ideas and data that will carefully build your case. Throwing in one of everything lying around in the stockroom isn't building a media kitits emptying the trash. Your media kit should be like a well-dressed salesperson. Everything works together. Theres a single style and a single clear "statement." Forget sending in a troupe of clowns to pour out of a tiny car. Sin Number 4: The best media kit makes your formal sales presentation to the media buyer or ad director on its own, which occurs later when its time to add you publication to the clients annual ad budget. Your salesperson wont be on the scene for that decision, so the kit must seal the sale on its own. The best media kit is actually a great sales presentation, too. Therefore, its very efficient to produce your new media kit and new stand-up presentation simultaneously. But before you start working on the kit, make a clear outline of the best possible sales presentation. Heres a simple, clear outline that will always work for your big sales presentation of the year: The market; >clients problems and challenges of reaching buyers in the market; >clients specific needs in target areas; >magazines coverage of one or more of those areas (including the magazines means of reaching buyers and proof that it does so, perhaps better than competing magazines or media); >and a demonstration of efficiency of using magazine to give client a return on its ad investment. You see, youre going from the clients competitive environment to a simple solution (an ad schedule in your publication) to solve some hairy marketing problems. Now, resist throwing in extraneous materials. Profiles of editors? There better be a good reason, and it must contribute to the logic of the presentation. A booklet on the magazine itselfwhy not just include a copy of the magazine in the final pocket? A reader survey? Hold the raw data. Instead, interpret the important points that apply to the client and his marketing problems in a separate-but-integral booklet. Trade show flyers? If your trade show plays an important part in your clients annual marketing plan, include an original document about the benefit of the show. Sin Number 5: The copy is all about what the magazine is doing and its ad sales successes. Sound familiar? Expecting the media buyer or ad director to judge you by the contents and design of the magazine is to miss the point. Theyll occasionally want to make some judgments based on the quality of the editorial and the presence of ads from their competitors. But their interests are far more complex. Youre not selling magazines to advertising clients. Youre selling the purchasing power of a specific body of readers. How you harness that purchasing power and bring it to the advertisers is your most powerful story. Its sad how few publishers tell it. The Magazine Doctor has been called in to diagnose the problems with a media kit that did nothing more than (1) carry a copy or two of the magazine and (2) described the magazine in detail. You dont really have to tell advertising agencies about the editorial or technical editors column if they can find it in the magazine on their own. [Pity, too, the poor media buyer who has to sit through a salespersons presentation that is nothing more than a rehash of an issue of the publication.] The diagnosis is clear. The publisher doesnt really have a handle on what he has to sell to the advertiser. So the MagDoc repeats: Its not the magazine. Its the way the magazine pulls together the collective buying power of its target readers and makes it available to the advertiser. Sin Number 6: Perhaps your salespeople know which order to remove and read the material, but the advertising client doesnt. So what do you do? Arrange the pieces in a multicolor, graduated cascade (sometimes called a waterfall)? In theory cascades should work, with one clearly labeled piece neatly stacked above and behind the other. In practice, however, these are self-defeating. The piece with the least amount of text and illustrations is put in front (because its the shortest). The long one, no matter what the content or importance, is in the back. The client knows to stack them in order (if theres time), but theres no logic in the order in which the magazines sales story is presented. Can you really give the clients all they need to know about the markets your publication serves in the shortest piece? Should your rate card be in the middle? Does anybody willingly read something called: CIRCULATION? And should your ABC or BPA audit report be jammed behind everything with no label at all? Organization is second in importance to content. The publisher must be in charge of itnot the client.] Thats why two-pocket kits and cascades are so hard to use. The MagDoc often opts for four pockets, with flap labels telling the client where to start and how to progress. Sin Number 7: If you judged all the media kits that were "made" by the graphic designer and those that were ruined by a designer, the ruined stack would be higher by miles. So the first rule is to bring Charlie the designer in after you know what the kit is to do and have the basic materials in hand. You dont want your writers adapting the materials to a bizarre concept. You might also tell the designer to read up on the basics of media kit design. You dont want something that cant be filed, used on a desktop, or getting covered with fingerprints when handled. The next thing to remember is that you, the publisher, are in charge of the media it. Nobody else. It comes from your budget and you have invested in great materials to present to clients. You made sure the research and text were convincing. Thats your editorial and circulation story it must sell. And you expect a huge return on the total budget. Explain this to Charlie. Maybe twice. The Magazine Doctor always restates to Charlie something every graphic designer heard the first week of art school. Form follows function. Your media kit must function. It must sell advertising and do it convincingly. Tell Charlie that you want to see sketches of a kit that delivers the materials according to the format of your sales presentation (step by step). You might even say you want the kit to start selling your message from the cover right through to the back page of the last insert. Charlie will frown, and youd better have a hanky handy in case he breaks into tears. Insist on a progress review with Charlie every few days. You must see the directions Charlie is taking. Dont let him box you in with a weird idea that "is too far along to change." And tell him to start over if theres no logical connection between his design and the message. Not every magazine art director or graphic artist can design a media kit. Thats why the Magazine Doctor only uses specialists. Great kits can be developed with such stringent restrictions. MagDocs crew does it all the time. No two kits are ever alike, or even similar. Each is effective in the marketplace. The designer gets rave reviews. And the publisher reaps a huge return on his investment.
|
![]() |
|
|
All content
©2000 James P. Hamilton Please direct
all inquiries to |